For years, marketers have been dismissed for focusing on “vanity metrics.”
Page views, impressions, likes, and followers have all been dismissed as shallow indicators that don’t matter.
To be fair, marketers created this problem. As Brendan explains:
“I think a lot of marketers don’t get the seat at the table that they deserve because they’re so worried about marketing metrics and they’re not thinking about business metrics.”
That’s led to a conclusion that these metrics just don’t matter.
But what if that assumption is wrong?
Brendan Hufford, founder of Growth Sprints, decided to test it for himself.
From SEO to LinkedIn: testing the signals
First, Brendan pulled data from across multiple sources:
- LinkedIn for impressions and engagement
- Google Analytics + Google Search Console for web traffic
- ConvertKit for newsletter growth and engagement
- Nutshell CRM for leads, pipeline, and closed-won revenue
Then he started lining them up side by side in spreadsheets, looking for patterns. That’s when he saw something striking:
“The impressions came first, and the revenue came after, but they trended exactly together. There’s a strong correlation.”
LinkedIn impressions weren’t just noise. They were a leading indicator of pipeline and revenue.
Why correlation is more useful than causation
Brendan argues that in modern B2B, there’s no such thing as airtight attribution or a straight line through the funnel.
Sales cycles stretch 12-18 months. (Which means that marketing cycles are even longer – something nobody seems to talk about!).
With dozens of channels and touchpoints, trying to prove exact causation is unrealistic, which is why Brendan is such a fan of correlation over causation.
When impressions rise and revenue consistently follows, that’s a signal worth paying attention to. It may not satisfy the purists, but it gives GTM leaders something far more valuable: confidence to invest.
Applying the same lens across channels
The beauty of Brendan’s framework is that it doesn’t stop at LinkedIn. He shares how it just as easily translates to other channels, e.g.
- SEO: Are you ranking for terms that lead to revenue, or ones that just drive empty clicks?
- Email: Do subscribers who open more newsletters eventually become customers? If yes, maybe frequency should increase.
- Brand campaigns: Does strong awareness shorten the sales cycle? If so, it’s not vanity – it’s efficiency.
- Events and gifting: Do accounts that engage with these touchpoints close faster? Higher? More often?
The key is the same: find correlations between activity-level metrics and business outcomes, then double down where the signals are strong.
For GTM execs under pressure from CFOs, boards, and investors, this mindset reframes the conversation. Instead of defending impressions and clicks, you can show how they connect to pipeline and revenue – and use data to make smarter bets.
Get the full playbook for more GTM secrets
Brendan goes into more detail that’s worth checking out:
- How he approaches risk-taking without jeopardizing his entire business
- Why “Content IP” is the most important element most teams are missing